Jan 20 2015

New radar allows the government to see right into your home, whenever they want to


At least 50 U.S. law enforcement agencies have secretly equipped their officers with radar devices that allow them to effectively peer through the walls of houses to see whether anyone is inside, a practice raising new concerns about the extent of government surveillance.

Those agencies, including the FBI and the U.S. Marshals Service, began deploying the radar systems more than two years ago with little notice to the courts and no public disclosure of when or how they would be used. The technology raises legal and privacy issues because the U.S. Supreme Court has said officers generally cannot use high-tech sensors to tell them about the inside of a person’s house without first obtaining a search warrant.

The radars work like finely tuned motion detectors, using radio waves to zero in on movements as slight as human breathing from a distance of more than 50 feet. They can detect whether anyone is inside of a house, where they are and whether they are moving.

The Supreme Court ruled in 2001 that the Constitution generally bars police from scanning the outside of a house with a thermal camera unless they have a warrant, and specifically noted that the rule would apply to radar-based systems that were then being developed.

In 2013, the court limited police’s ability to have a drug dog sniff the outside of homes. The core of the Fourth Amendment, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote, is “the right of a man to retreat into his own home and there be free from unreasonable governmental intrusion.”

Still, the radars appear to have drawn little scrutiny from state or federal courts. The federal appeals court’s decision published last month was apparently the first by an appellate court to reference the technology or its implications.

Read the full article at USAToday.com.

sponsored links

Jan 20 2015

Then why does she have armed security?…


Jan 20 2015

You can’t fix stupid…


Jan 20 2015

Evolution Tuesday: Why Evolutionists Are Afraid of Fruit Flies

Fruit_fly 500x200

The wife decided on a neat treat for the kids, she’d seen somewhere about cutting a peeled banana in half, poking an ice cream stick into it and freezing it. She bought a bunch of bananas and made some for the kids. The kids were excited, but it turns out that they generally would eat about half the banancicle, then toss the rest (if we were lucky they’d think of tossing it in the trash can) In the end the kids has a bit of fun, the wife was comforted that they weren’t eating junk food, and we got a house chock full of fruit flies, gorging themselves on half eaten bananas.

I got some of that hanging fly paper (much to my wife’s chagrin, who considered it embarrassing to have to use it) and that caught about half of them. I figured since they were there I’d use the fruit flies as part of the kids’ homeschool. I’d raised fruit flies in high school as part of a project, so I was familiar with the general set up. I took a small jelly jar, poked some holes in the top. Put some dry baby food we’d bought last year when we were trying to raise some baby birds. Put in the baby food with a little yeast (I’m not completely sure why the yeast was needed, but we did it that way in high school) added water, then set the bottle over night where the fruit flies were congregating. By morning I had quite a party going on in that jar. I slapped the lid on and left them there for a few hours. I was planning on keeping them there for a few days, but it occurred to me that if I was able to catch so many this way, I’d just found the secret to getting them out of the house. And sure enough, after I let this batch go outside, and repeated the process, the ranks of our little friends shrank to a tolerable few who were wondering where the bananas had all gone to.

For some reason I was thinking that it took 30 days for fruit flies to mature, so it surprised me when after only two days larvae appeared in the jar. By that time I’d released all the adults so we’d have only the adults who had hatched in the jar. By this afternoon several of the larvae had already become pupae. I looked up some info and this is a lot quicker than what the web sites were saying is the norm, but I took the opportunity to explain the process to my kids, as well as some fascinating implications.

People have been studying fruit flies for hundreds of years. They’ve drawn sketches, taken notes, bred, cross bred and manipulated in laboratories, as well as those in the wild. The average span from egg to egg is 7 days. So of you just take 200 years of human meddling in fruit fly genetics at 7 days per generation that’s just a hair more than 10,428 generations. Now since humans, on the average take about 25 years from birth to having a child, that would be a little more than 260,714 years. Which means that according to Evolutionists, those scientists observing fruit flies 200 years ago would have been looking at “Neanderthal” fruit flies. Funny thing is, the descriptions are pretty much exactly the same as we have today.

Another funny thing is the “mutations” Evolutionist bring out to show the “changes” that fruit flies are supposedly being improved with (I put changes in quotes, because there is no evidence that this is a change rather than traits already long existent within the gene pool of fruit flies). Normal fruit flies have red eyes, but they’ve found “mutations” that have white eyes and orange eyes. How orange or white eyes are supposed to help fruit flies they didn’t explain. Other mutations include, eyeless fruit flies, short winged fruit flies, curly winged fruit flies, yellow skinned fruit flies and black skinned fruit flies (somehow the NAACP hasn’t noticed that Evolutionists are calling Black skin a mutation, hmmm.). I guess if it’s convenient, variety is called “mutations”. These same “scientists” seem oblivious to the variety within domestic dog breeds. Not something generally referred to as “mutations”.

The lesson I left my kids with so far is how fruit fly live, reproduce and grow, as well as an observation of how sometimes things called “science” aren’t really very scientific at all. Science is learning how the world works by observing it, not deciding ahead of time and defining your terms inconsistently so your presuppositions can be rationalized.

Originally posted June 24th, 2002 at JackLewis.net.

It should be noted that in order to finally address and “explain” some tremendous flaws in the timeline of the religion of Evolution, it’s acolytes have changed their belief that humans descended from Neanderthals, to humans lived alongside Neanderthals and shared a common ancestor. All mention of Neanderthals now assume this new narrative, and virtually all previous sources that cited the teaching that Neanderthals were the ancestors of humans have been scrubbed, possibly by a government functionary named Winston Smith.

It should also be noted that contrary to my assertion in 2002 (in this article) that we have detailed studies of fruit flies going back 200 years, we actually have detailed studies going back 350 years. Theatre of Insects by Thomas Mofet was published in 1658, and gives detailed descriptions of numerous insects, including the fruit fly. That gives us 18,225 generations of fruit flies, putting Mofet’s fruit flies at the equivalent of humans 455,625 years ago, well beyond when Evolutionists have claimed humans still looked like humans.

Jan 20 2015

Incompetence or Insurrection?…


Jan 20 2015

John Hayward: Bloated Parasites…


Jan 20 2015

Should you see Taken 3?…

That’s in addition to it being a really sucky movie to begin with.

Jan 20 2015

Blind Critique


Jan 20 2015

Larry Elder: Civil Rights…


Jan 20 2015

Liberals and Metaphors


Jan 20 2015

Billion Dollar Government Security Device…


Jan 20 2015

We Annoy, Therefore We Exist!


Jan 20 2015

The Ugly Side of Europe…


Jan 20 2015

The Irony of America


Jan 19 2015