May 20 2015

Way Back Archives: Acceptable in public…


sponsored links

May 15 2015

Way Back Archives: Religious tolerance…


(When we posted this the first time, we were banned from Facebook for 3 days for violating their “Community Standards”. Which is why we don’t post images to Facebook any more.)

May 14 2015

Way Back Archives: The real v. imaginary US Constitutions…


May 9 2015

Heroes come in all shapes and sizes…


May 7 2015

Seriously, they could make a sailor blush…


Apr 22 2015

Trigger Warning! Trigger Warning!


Apr 6 2015

Political Correctness…


Mar 30 2015

Is the First Amendment, “Pro Hate Speech”?


Mar 18 2015

Way Back Archives: Hate Speech v Free Speech…


Mar 9 2015

Way Back Archives: Freedom of Expression…


Feb 19 2015

Way Back Archives: Acceptable in public…


Jan 19 2015

Men Without Chests: How C.S. Lewis Predicted Charlie Hebdo Censorship

“It is an outrage that they should be commonly spoken of as Intellectuals. This gives them the chance to say that he who attacks them attacks Intelligence. It is not so. They are not distinguished from other men by an unusual skill in finding truth nor any virginal ardour to produce her…It is not excess of thought but defect of fertile and generous emotion that marks them out. Their heads are no bigger than the ordinary: it is the atrophy of the chest beneath that makes them seem so.” —C.S. Lewis, “The Abolition of Man”

Western news organizations are falling all over themselves to censor images that raise the ire of violent terrorists, and C.S. Lewis predicted their exact behavior over 70 years ago when he published “The Abolition of Man,” his treatise on how the corruption of language leads inevitably to the corruption of mind and soul. Which brings us to the pathetic and censorious response by so many media organizations to the Islamic terrorist attack against Charlie Hebdo, a French satirical publication.

The main photo for this story is courtesy of the New York Daily News. (The absurd pixelation of the cartoon on the front page of the Charlie Hebdo paper was done by the New York Daily News, not by The Federalist.)

The New York Daily News’s censorship is emblematic of the response of far too many media organizations to the Charlie Hebdo massacre. Peaceful people who are offended must deal with offense, but violent sociopaths who are thrown into murderous rages by cartoons? Their feelings must be respected. Welcome to 2015, where polite requests for decency are ignored, and childish temper tantrums are exalted as the means by which developmentally stunted neanderthals get whatever they want. Which brings us to CNN.

Following the Charlie Hebdo attack, CNN allegedly issued a memo to staff detailing what types of images and words would be banned by the network and what would be allowed:

Although we are not at this time showing the Charlie Hebdo cartoons of the Prophet considered offensive by many Muslims, platforms are encouraged to verbally describe the cartoons in detail. This is key to understanding the nature of the attack on the magazine and the tension between free expression and respect for religion.

Video or stills of street protests showing Parisians holding up copies of the offensive cartoons, if shot wide, are also OK. Avoid close-ups of the cartoons that make them clearly legible.

It’s also OK to show most of the protest cartoons making the rounds online, though care should be taken to avoid examples that include within them detailed depictions of the Charlie Hebdo cartoons.

Read the full article at The

“In a sort of ghastly simplicity we remove the organ and demand the function. We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and bid the gelding be fruitful.”—C.S. Lewis

Jan 17 2015

Mark Twain: Censorship…


Jan 17 2015

Rev. Elijah Lovejoy: Abolitionist murdered in 1837 by Democrats opposed to mixing religion and politics…


Jan 10 2015

Crazy & Crazier…