Sep 15 2014

Black Genocide


Google Adsense

Sep 13 2014

Mass Murder/Genocide Levels


Sep 12 2014

Location, location, location…


Sep 10 2014

55 Million Dead Babies, and We Thought Hitler Was Bad For Killing 6 Million Jews…


Sep 6 2014

Top Annual Deaths…


Sep 5 2014

Pro-death Liberals, say 13-year-olds can decide to kill their baby, but a 16-year-old too young to decide her baby can live.

neonatalbaby 500x200

One-year-old Aleah Peaslee, who was left in a coma last December after allegedly being shaken by her 21-year-old father, miraculously emerged from the state not long after being placed in the arms of her mother, Virginia Trask, according to court papers. But by then, Trask, told by doctors the baby’s brain damage was severe, had signed off on a DNR order and the baby had been taken into custody by the state due to the alleged abuse at the hands of Kevin Peaslee.

What has ensued is a legal battle over who has the right to rescind the order, the state or the parent. And although a state court ruled in favor of the Maine Department of Health and Human Development, Gov. Paul LePage made clear to on Thursday that he will not allow state bureaucrats to usurp a parent’s rights regardless of how the appellate court, which has the case on its docket Sept. 23, comes down.

“This case is disturbing and is not reflective of my Administration’s position that a parent who is the legal guardian of their child should have final say in medical decisions about life-sustaining treatment,” said LePage. “The existing law violates the sanctity of parental rights, and I cannot support it.  Unless a parent is deemed unfit and parental rights are severed, the state should not override a parent’s right to make medical decisions for their own child.”

Trask already had a team of heavy hitters helping her appeal the Maine District Court decision from earlier this year. Attorneys with the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), the Roman Catholic Diocese of Portland and three other advocacy groups have filed friend-of-the-court briefs arguing that state officials, who maintain temporary custody of the baby, do not have the constitutional right to interfere with Trask’s parental rights.

Read the full article at

Aug 28 2014

In Spite of Hobby Lobby Ruling, Obama Slaps Heavy Fines On Nuns Not Paying for Abortions

nuns 500x200

The Obama administration revised the HHS mandate rules — the first revision since losing to Hobby Lobby at the Supreme Court. The revisions provide no relief from the mandate and essentially restate how pro-life groups, like the Little Sisters, will have to pay huge fines if the violate the mandate.

The upshot of the new rules? As Arina Grossu, Director for the Center for Human Dignity at the Family Research Council, tells LifeNews, it’s “the threat of crippling fines on non-profits who stand up for their freedom of conscience.”

Congressman Chris Smith, the top pro-life advocate in the House of Representatives, tells LifeNews that resident Obama has resorted to coercion and massive, punitive fines against pro-life organizations and faith-based groups that oppose the mandate because, for moral reasons,they cannot and will not include abortion-causing drugs, sterilization and contraception procedures in their private health insurance plans.

“Here he goes again. This new ‘notification option’ announced today is really just another highly coercive regulation—a direct, obnoxious, unprecedented government attack on the conscience rights of religious entities and anyone else who for moral reasons cannot and will not include potentially abortion-causing drugs—such as ella—or contraception and sterilization procedures in their private insurance plans,” said Smith, co-chairman of the Bipartisan Congressional Pro-Life Caucus.

Read the full article at

Aug 23 2014

Obama Ignores Supreme Court, Wants to Punish Hobby Lobby Anyway

abortion is murder 500x200

Under ObamaCare, Christian-Owned businesses like Hobby Lobby were forced to participate in aborting babies. Hobby Lobby said NO, took it to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court agreed with Hobby Lobby that the government has no legitimate business forcing Christians to participate in the killing of unborn children.

But to Liberals, “no” simply means, “Find another way of doing it.” Meaning find some way to involve Christians in killing unborn children that kinda, sorta doesn’t seem like the same way you were doing it before. Their usual method is to simply rename it, and proceed to do the exact same thing (as in renaming “buffer zone”, “security zone” and continue to violate the law)

The Obama administration released a fact sheet on the newly-proposed HHS mandate rule pertaining to non-profit organizations and closely held for-profit entities, like Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties. The factsheet on the new rules makes it clear that the HHS mandate violates the conscience rights of non-profit organizations and family businesses across the country.

The upshot of the new rules? As Arina Grossu, Director for the Center for Human Dignity at the Family Research Council, tells LifeNews, it’s “the threat of crippling fines on non-profits who stand up for their freedom of conscience.”

“What remains an insulting accounting gimmick does not protect the rights of Americans with sincere conscientious objections. It is simply another clerical layer to an already existing accounting gimmick that does nothing to protect religious freedom because the employer still remains the legal gateway by which these drugs and services will be provided to their employees,” she said. “It’s very disappointing that the Obama administration is doubling down on its plans to punish charities and non-profits that assist the poor and homeless, who in some cases have nowhere else to turn for assistance.”

In a nut shell, in order to drag Christians into the abortion holocaust, Obama is demanding that Christian business initiate the process of insurance companies providing abortifacients drugs, and if the Christian business won’t participate, they get fined, a lot. The business doesn’t have to pay for the baby to be murdered, just give permission.

Why? Because it’s never been about “women’s health” but about forcing Liberal immorality on Christians.


Aug 13 2014

When Liberals attack a Black, Female Democrat…you know something is fishy.

Katrina R. Jackson is a Democratic member of the Louisiana House of Representatives, representing District 16. She was first elected to the chamber in 2011.

Katrina R. Jackson is a Democratic member of the Louisiana House of Representatives, representing District 16. She was first elected to the chamber in 2011.

Louisiana’s HB 388 requires abortionists to attain admitting privileges within 30 miles of their facility, clarifies that the “Women’s Right to Know” law applies to chemical, as well as surgical abortions, and requires doctors who perform more than five abortions a year to maintain proper licensing.

The author of the bill, Rep. Katrina Jackson, was heavily criticized for her leadership and determination to get the legislation passed. This is because she is a Democratic, African American woman who is proudly pro-life.

One of the first to criticize Rep. Jackson’s bill was none other than Cecile Richards, the President and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America. In a May 28th article, Richards claimed that women disapproved of HB 388. She said that politicians are attacking women’s health by restricting access to abortion and women won’t stand for this. However, Richards overlooked the fact that HB 388 is for women and by women. The legislation was drafted with the legal expertise of a Bioethics Defense Fund attorney who happens to be a woman. The bill was supported by the committee testimony of Kathy Kleibert, the woman who serves as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals. A woman representative, Sharon Weston Broome (D-Baton Rouge), carried HB 388 on the Senate side and two-thirds of the women members in the legislative body voted in support of this bill.

Another criticism of HB 388 was that it would negatively affect the African-American community. This came to light during the Louisiana House Health and Welfare Committee meeting on March 19th. According to the Christian Post, pro-abortion advocates and abortion clinic employees testified that, among all women, abortion benefits black women the most.

However, Rep. Jackson disagreed and said the following about the committee meeting:

“The No. 1 genocide in the African-American community, and why we’re   becoming a minority of minorities, is because most of our babies are dying in the womb from abortions.

The comments regarding African-American women were that abortion helped them make a choice when they couldn’t take care of their child. And I told them that wasn’t a cure. If you want to really cure the situation that’s going on socioeconomically with everyone, you do that by supporting measures that give people a hand up, and not a handout.”

She continued by saying, “I’m very passionate, especially when you’re looking at the African-American community, because those in the pro-choice community have been attempting to sell us on abortion being a way out for women who can’t afford to have their baby.”

Aug 5 2014

A Child, not a Choice…


Aug 5 2014

Judge Moron


Aug 1 2014

What Society Indeed…


Jul 31 2014

Massachusetts thumbs its nose at Supreme Court, trying to enact virtually the same law already declared unconstitutional.

abortuary buffer zone 500x200

In their ruling, the Supreme Court struck down a Massachusetts law that created a 35-foot “buffer zone” restricting pro-life advocates from speaking with people entering abortion facilities.

Saying the abortion buffer zone is “inconsistent with the First Amendment,” the Supreme Court ruled that that the buffer zone violated the First Amendment because it “restricts access to ‘public way[s]’ and ‘sidewalk[s],’ places that have traditionally been open for speech activities.”

Now, Massachusetts lawmakers have responded with a vengeance — passing a radical bill that prohibits free speech for pro-lifers seeking to help women.

Today, Governor Deval Patrick, who is a staunch abortion proponent and a former board member of Planned Parenthood, signed the bill into law.

Under the new law, peaceful demonstrations are allowed within any range of abortuaries so long as they are non-threatening and do not block facility entrances. Protests that fail to comply with these rules are subject to dispersal or punishment by law enforcement. “Failing to comply” is generally interpreted as being Pro-Life while near an abortuary.

Demonstrations that “impede” clinic entrances will be immediately dispersed, an authority granted to police under the new law. Once a written dispersal order is issued, dispersed protestors will be banned from coming within 25 feet of the clinic for eight hours or until the clinic closes. The law requires this 25-foot zone to be clearly marked, and the lawful demonstration rules must be visibly posted.

In other words, Massachusetts will allow pro-life demonstrators access until police can quickly arrive and tell them to leave, and the police do that already with absolutely no provocation or reason. Once told to leave, those individuals would then be subject to a new 25-foot buffer. The only difference between the old law and the new is the distance, and police are involved to create the illusion that the matter is now a “safety” issue.

SOURCES:, The Boston Globe.

Jul 31 2014

Court: To protect “choice” women must be endangered.

abortion is murder 500x200

A U.S. Circuit Court ruled Tuesday that the state of Mississippi may not require abortion doctors in that state to have admitting privileges at local hospitals. The court said the requirement “imposes an undue burden on a woman’s right to choose an abortion.”

The issue in Mississippi seems to be that there is only one abortion clinic left in the state and that no local hospital is willing to give admitting privileges to its abortionists. The result would be that the remaining abortion clinic would have to close.

Steven Ertelt, who runs a pro-life group in Colorado and edits, told Breitbart News that the ruling fails on at least three counts: “It fails to uphold the rule of law, where the state of Mississippi sought to protect women and children. The court ignores the fact that the abortion facility is putting women’s health and lives at risk by not having admitting privileges. The Court seems to think that every state in the nation ought to have at least one abortion clinic.”

Admitting privileges are important for doctors, particularly those that perform surgical procedures, because most insurance companies require such privileges in order to give coverage. According to admitting privileges are fairly easy to obtain. There are two types: Courtesy privileges allow a physician to occasionally admit patients, which would satisfy the law, while full privileges require the physicians to attend hospital staff meetings.

Read the full article at

Jul 30 2014

Pedophile takes his 12 year-old victim to three different abortion clinics without being reported once

kidnapped_girl 500

According to court documents, Joseph Coles, 40, began having sex with his stepdaughter when she was 10-years-old.  At 12, “Celena” became pregnant and her mother took her to the Cleveland Surgi-Center abortion clinic (#1).  The abortion was botched and Celena almost died from internal hemorrhaging.  Given that the assaults on Celena resumed afterward, it is clear the clinic did not file a report.  Following the abortion, Coles persuaded Celena’s mother to put her on birth control; however, in 2004 Celena again became pregnant by Coles and was taken to Planned Parenthood in Shaker Heights (#2).  She refused to submit to the abortion at that time but relented three days later and was taken to the Preterm Abortion Clinic in Cleveland (#3).  As before, it is evident no report was made by either Planned Parenthood or Preterm since the assaults on Celena resumed after the second abortion.  In June of the following year, police were made aware of the situation and Coles was arrested.  After being convicted, he received a total of 210 years in prison and Celena’s mother was given three years for endangering children and obstructing justice.